BROCK - Grain Silo

Submitted by Ken Norton on Fri, 02/10/2017 - 14:58

brock

BROCK - Grain Silo, Creston, IA.

Photo was taken with the Olympus E-3 with DZ 40-150 zoom lens at 150mm. ISO 100, F7.1, 1/400. Exposure adjusted in Lightroom to darken the silo and create the contrast of a B&W print which still contains the color of the scene.

 

Kodak Ektachrome Returns

Submitted by Ken Norton on Mon, 01/09/2017 - 19:06

Picture of slides on keyboard

On January 5th, 2017, Kodak and Kodak Alaris announced the return of the Ektachrome film stock. It is expected the availability will be in the fourth quarter of the year. Kodak Alaris sells and markets the still photography film stock, Kodak the long-roll film stock. While neither have specified which version of Ektachrome, in ISO 100, will be formulated, it appears that it will be the long-roll movie stock which is the driver for this and Kodak Alaris will sell the 36-exposure roll version of it.

While Ektachrome was not my own preferred slide film, I still shot a lot of it through the years. The color accuracy is uncanny and the film utterly predictable without color shifs in the shadows. This color accuracy meant that I avoided it for much of my landscape photography as not every landscape photograph benefited from being "accurate". It was a film that was the industry standard choice whenever accuracy was required. Product photography, fashion and industrial photography, as well as portraits for offset printing required Ektachrome.

The question comes up from anybody who shoots little to no film, as to the logic in bringing back a "slide" film when nobody projects slides anymore, and there are no labs around to develop E6 anyway. The key is to understand that this isn't to "replace" a pure digital workflow, but to augment a pure digital workflow and provide options. E6 processing is available for most everybody in the USA through Dwayne's Photo. I personally process my own B&W and E6 film and provide this service to others right on this very website.

How does Ektachrome compare to the Fujichromes? This will be an unknown until we see exactly which Ektachrome film stock is utilized, but Ektachrome will most likely be the closest match to a digital camera standard profile of any of the available chromes. With moderate profiling, images shot on film and images shot on a digital camera should be interchangeable through the rest of the digital workflow. While Ektachrome has not been my own particular favorite slide film, I do plan on using it for some projects where I do need this interchangeability.

My own procedure for shooting, processing and handling of the film maximizes the strengths where there are strengths and minimizes the weaknesses as much as possible. I shoot with the film camera best serving my purpose (long astrophotography images on winter nights would be the OM-3Ti). Processing E6 film is only slightly more difficult than B&W, and comparable to B&W if using dual developers. Once washed and dried, I cut the film to strips and immediately scan them. Once scanned, the strips are placed in archival sheets for long-term storage. The scanned rolls are named and numbered in subdirectores with an index number that is placed on the archival sheet. In Adobe Lightroom, I just sync the scans folder and those new subdirectories and scans are automatically added to my Lightroom Catalog. At this point, the scanned images are treated as though they are any other image from any other source.

Shooting film is not for everything, nor is it cost and time effective. However, just as an adjustable wrench may work on loosening a bolt, a socket set might be a better choice. Shooting film in film cameras is like adding a socket set to the tool bag instead of just relying on an adjustable wrench.

Ken

 

DIY Auto Repair - Sounds like a great idea. Maybe

Submitted by Ken Norton on Mon, 12/12/2016 - 16:45

Point of No Return

My daily driver is a 2004 BMW X5 with the 4.4L V8 and sport suspension. It is a fantastic vehicle in pretty much every way. We purchased it three years ago with 91,000 miles on it. Excellent condition, well cared for, mechanically sound, and so forth. It was also optioned up really nicely. Four months earlier, we had purchased another X5, but a large deer and 70mph don't mix well. Insurance company got me another one. The only repairs and service this vehicle has needed is sway bar link replacement, an alignment and a new battery. The original battery lasted two weeks short of 12 years. Just change the tire and oil and that's all it has required. It now has 165,000 miles on it and a several weeks ago, it started making a noise. A screeching and grinding noise under the hood. Ugh. That can mean only one of two things in this case. Either a belt tensioner has
gone bad or the water pump is failing. The positive news is that it wasn't a tensioner. The negative news is that it was the water pump.

I get an estimate for repair and wasn't too excited about spending four digits to get the water pump replaced. The wannabe mechanic inside of my head said "Hey, why not do it yourself?" I talk with a relative who does their own work on both BMWs and Mercedes and was highly encouraged. They would even come and help do it. I've done a
replacement on a Jeep Cherokee, so it's not like the concept is foreign to me. (insert hysterical laughter here).

Grill

Tags
Subscribe to